5DCA: Impermissible Evidence of Misconduct During Sentencing Hearing

Even where a sentencing judge does not state on the record that he considered such when fashioning the sentence, incidents of misconduct occurring after the charged offense, some of which did not result in charges or arrests, were impermissible sentencing factors.

Love v. State, 2D17-76 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 12, 2018)


Pasco Co.

Valarie Linnen, Esq. Criminal, Civil, and Administrative Appeals
Postconviction Relief
PO Box 330339, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
PO Box 200, Chippewa Lake, MI 49320

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s